What is trumps stand on gay marriage

However, the article gives no indication that Trump has shifted his views on marriage equality since , referencing past interviews in which he opposed marriage rights for same-sex couples. Donald Trump has had varying views on gay marriage in recent decades.

Here's what to know ahead of his inauguration in Before he was elected president, Trump told CNN's Jake Tapper in that he is "just for traditional marriage." But after being elected president in November , he said in an interview. President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump both support same-sex marriage, although their views on the issue have evolved over the years. Biden has pushed to expand open LGBTQ+.

Same-Sex Marriage: Trump opposed same-sex marriage before becoming president, and later said he’s “fine with” it because it’s now “settled” and “irrelevant.” However, his administration still. If such discrimination were to occur, it would violate not only the Equal Protection Clause for the reasons discussed above, but also the Establishment Clause, which the Supreme Court has recognized prohibits religious criteria to be used in carrying out government programs, whether those programs are carried out by government employees or government contractors.

Events More events. Add Topic. Jeff Sralla, left, and his partner of 28 years, Gerald Gafford, wed in in Texas. Notably, however, the decision is based on the record in and context of the Tennessee case and therefore does not extend to other cases concerning discrimination based on transgender status. We are as determined as ever to fight for the dignity and equality of every transgender person and we will continue to do so with defiant strength, a restless resolve, and a lasting commitment to our families, our communities, and the freedom we all deserve.

We believe the lower courts were right to block these discriminatory laws, and we will continue to defend the freedom of all kids to play. Source: American Civil Liberties Union. By: Gillian Branstetter. That well-reasoned decision should stand the test of time, and we stand ready to defend it. Second, lawmakers in Missouri and Tennessee have introduced legislation that would create a new category of marriage that would be available only to opposite-sex couples.

As argued above, a second Trump administration would go beyond policies that make discrimination legal and would also mandate discrimination against LGBTQ people by the federal government. When asked by NBC News if Trump planned to roll back same-sex marriage, incoming press secretary Karoline Leavitt, said "that was never a campaign promise that he made.

The ACLU is already litigating the scope of federal nondiscrimination coverage for LGBTQ people in the courts, and we will continue to sue to protect the broad scope of these federal civil rights laws if a new Trump administration tries to narrow it. In May, President Donald Trump bullied a year-old transgender girl for participating in a high school track meet. The ACLU has litigated against claims that the First Amendment entitles businesses that are open to the public to discriminate against LGBTQ people, and would similarly oppose such arguments asserted by employers.

Mobilizing public support on behalf of vulnerable children and youth — as the ACLU did in the context of family separation — will help deter further draconian policies and can help reshape the political narrative around transgender justice. Smith after the decision that continued to uphold same-sex marriage rights.

Respect for marriage act

Since , 27 states have banned transgender youth from playing school sports. California, Colorado and Hawaii passed ballot measures in the Nov. Legal and policy battles — even those that are unsuccessful in the short run — can serve to frame and focus fights over values in ways that are politically resonant in the long term. Here's How to Take Action.

With high public support for same-sex marriage and previous Supreme Court decisions, some say there is little cause for concern about the continued rights of same-sex marriage. A second Trump administration would not be able to implement such a policy without Congress, making it likely that fair-minded people could prevent such a horror. Conclusion Across the country in recent years, transgender people and their families have been targeted by a relentless assault on their rights, their safety, and their fundamental freedom to be themselves.

This would strip LGBTQ people of nondiscrimination guarantees across a vast swath of federal government programs including Social Security, Medicare, and housing programs, as well as federal government employment. Moreover, the federal government overturning policies enacted by local and state officials can create a clear narrative for the media about a MAGA government ramming through unpopular and extreme policies around which to build political resistance.

We fully expect a second Trump administration to go further, weaponizing federal law to override state level protections and mandate discrimination by schools and health care providers nationwide.